Good news here since it's suppose to have been their primo stuff... unfortunately I have discovered not all strings with a declaration of Made in Japan to be up to spec - will reveal in the following months.
BG66 Maxima is currently no longer in production. If you are lucky enough to locate any, they would cost an arm&leg!
Blog for Badminton stringer(s).
I have been restringing for over 15years and learnt the craft from my flatmate in New Zealand, who learnt it from his father - an ex-district player in Malaysia.
UPDATE - Comments can now be added without moderation
horzt1
horz1
Tuesday, January 2, 2018
Sunday, December 10, 2017
Digital Calipher Vernier (to 2-decimal point) - for verifying string thickness
Finally managed to obtain a reasonable cost digital calipher vernier which was accurate to 2-decimal points. Purchased it during the Black Friday sales.
The LR44 battery was pre-loaded. Now to test for accuracy and if it was functional:-
1. Switch it on and set units to millimeter.
2. Slide the jaws to the minimum gently and press the ZERO button to calibrate it accordingly.
3. Next I slide the caliper jaws open until the display showed 5.00mm - not as easy as it seems due to the 2-decimal point accuracy.
4. Then I place it next to a ruler for comparison - ruler in centimeters (but was placed up-side down๐)
As such I was not going to return it ๐๐๐
![]() |
| As per received |
The LR44 battery was pre-loaded. Now to test for accuracy and if it was functional:-
1. Switch it on and set units to millimeter.
2. Slide the jaws to the minimum gently and press the ZERO button to calibrate it accordingly.
3. Next I slide the caliper jaws open until the display showed 5.00mm - not as easy as it seems due to the 2-decimal point accuracy.
4. Then I place it next to a ruler for comparison - ruler in centimeters (but was placed up-side down๐)
![]() |
| Works as advertised! |
![]() |
| Close-up of the ruler and caliper jaws |
Friday, December 1, 2017
Awaiting a digital vernier calipher ... (***UPDATE#2***)
Purchased a unit capable of displaying up to 2-decimal points on eBay and it was suppose to have arrive by 1st week of Sept2017.
8Oct2017
eBay refunded as looks like the seller from Hong Kong was not very responsive. Seem to encounter quite a few of such issues when buying from HK sellers on eBay.
1Dec2017
Took the Black Friday opportunity to buy a digital calipher capable of 2-decimal points - fingers cross. Now awaiting delivery from the US.
Unfortunately not arrive yet. Hence will delay the article on how thick a string really is VS the specification on the packaging.
Am sure we have all notice on the packets of strings (from the same manufacturer & model) - some appear to be thicker visually, than the other at the shop display.
8Oct2017
eBay refunded as looks like the seller from Hong Kong was not very responsive. Seem to encounter quite a few of such issues when buying from HK sellers on eBay.
1Dec2017
Took the Black Friday opportunity to buy a digital calipher capable of 2-decimal points - fingers cross. Now awaiting delivery from the US.
Friday, November 10, 2017
"Fake" Victor racquet?
I could not resist buying a Victor BraveSword 12 from PRC as the price was just simply irresistible!!!
When my regulars compared the PRC purchase (neon string) against the original (white string) - we could not distinguish the two when playing with them! Dimensions and feel when held are about the same. Both are Made in China
Visible differences are-
- deeper tone of blue on the original vs the lighter, brighter blue of the "fake"
- red grommets on the "fake" are bright red vs blood red on the real thing
- "Taiwan" on the logo cover, at the base of the handle of the "fake"
Hence I suspect the cheap racquet I purchase was highly likely to be a factory reject as there are differences only in the quality of the finishing, not performance or feel wise.
Here's a unexpected twist (not made up) - the owner of the white string original racquet actually bought his SG issue BraveSword-12 after testing my cheap racquet๐!!! Reason was because the PRC vendor I originally purchased from sold out his 4U stock and had only 3U units left.
Please do note there is really a fake version and feels different. It is sold with only black grommets all round.
![]() |
| "Fake" BRS-12 with neon string vs SG issued BRS-12 with with string |
![]() |
| Please note the red grommets. The TRUE FAKE unit has only black grommets all round |
![]() |
| Grommet layout and spacing are consistent for both. Thus producing the same feedback upon usage. Previously the fake Dunlop reviewed had different grommet laysouts which did not provide same feedback as per original |
![]() |
| Taken from an angle but if eyeball-ed - both are of the same dimensions |
![]() |
| As per befofe, pix taken at angle |
![]() |
| Poorer finishing on the racquet I believe is a factory reject (aka neon string). Side-1 |
![]() |
| Poorer finishing on the racquet I believe is a factory reject (aka neon string). Side-2 |
Sunday, October 8, 2017
One method to stop string movement
Taking inspiration from the old stringing method via a crank, this is one possible method to stop or minimise string movement.
The middle strings loosen after few weeks. Shame to restring as the strings look ok. Hence applied the above and seem to do the job - it's as good as a restring! Tension it by hand only.
![]() |
| Line horizontal line before the shaft |
![]() |
| Close-up of the last horizontal line |
Saturday, July 1, 2017
Sweet-spot training racquet
I recently purchased a sweet spot training racquet after discovering the availability of such a novelty - for the fun of it!
Once strung, players in my usual group did not have much of an issue hitting the shuttle except need to be more focus when performing netting. Despite the smaller frame, the racquet was fantastic for backhand shots!!! Another player found it was more difficult to perform slicing during drop-shots (maybe due to small stringbed).
Otherwise it was positive feedback all round!
![]() |
| Sweet-spot training racquet in the middle vs ISO vs Box-shape frame |
![]() |
| Sweet-spot racquet overlap on a traditional box-shaped frame |
![]() |
| Sweet-spot racquet overlap on a modern ISO-shaped frame |
Thursday, June 1, 2017
Smartphone app to determine tension
The idea to use a smartphone app to determine racquet stringbed tension is not new.
The latest newbie is Stringster.
After downloading the app which is free, you must register before using it. Then you need to define your racquet and string make/model to the app before proceeding to test your racquet's tension.
Since the library of predefined racquets and strings are limited, I picked a string which has the closest characteristics to the product I was using - results as below. Must admit it is pretty good as my racquet which was strung at 23lbs with Gosen G-Tone5.
One good news is that if you do know the characteristics of your racquet and the strings, you can then use what's available in the predefined library (provided you have knowledge of the product characteristics) to provide a rough gauge of your racquet stringbed tension. The other is 1st racquet defined to your profile is FOC. After that you need to pay for the extra features.
CON is the predefined library of racquet(s) and string(s) does not include other major manufacturers such as Gosen, APACS, Fleet, Mizuno, etc. Hence accuracy of the results for the undefined products are questionable.
*I am not affiliated to Stringster in any manner of form. I am just curious and installed the app to try it out
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















